So in this blog post, I am going to share with you some of the experiences some of us here at KDAB have had using Visual Studio Code for Qt development.A new generation toolset for embedded C/C++ development. Software developers like tools, and in particular tools that make them more productive. This extension collects usage data and sends it to Microsoft to help improve our products and. For more information see the Code of Conduct FAQ or contact opencodemicrosoft.com with any additional questions or comments. This project has adopted the Microsoft Open Source Code of Conduct. Microsoft Open Source Code of Conduct.
Microsoft Visual Code C++ Software Development ProcessIn addition to a code editor and debugger, Visual Studio for Mac includes compilers, code completion tools, graphical designers, and source control features to ease the software development process.Motivation of using Visual Studio Code instead of Qt CreatorIDE-like features Supported by a large community of users and Microsoft. NET integrated development environment on the Mac that can be used to edit, debug, and build code and then publish an app. Visual Studio for Mac is a.Welcome to the Microsoft Visual Studio Facebook page. NET and Visual Studio for Mac are working for our customers in the real world.The first question you want to ask is probably, “Why use another editor or IDE at all if we have Qt Creator, which is a perfectly good and, in particular, Qt-specific IDE, ready at our disposal?” And, of course, that’s a very valid question to ask.Microsoft Visual Studio. We’ve been using and testing with M1 Macs, but it’s always great to hear how.My current work setup uses both in parallel.I have configured both to auto-save and auto-reload so that I can switch seamlessly between the two. I am not advocating to ditch Qt Creator altogether. Also, I am doing a lot of my development on macOS, and Qt Creator does not always have the same level of stability there as it does on Linux and Windows.If not, here’s a quick summary.Microsoft Visual Studio is Microsoft’s big and comprehensive IDE/compiler/debugger package for C# and C++ development that has been around for many years and is available for Windows and macOS (but not for Linux). Many of you are most likely familiar with Microsoft Visual Studio. When I move focus, my changes are already there (or I just need to hit the “Yes to All” button in the reload confirmation dialog) and I am getting the best of both worlds.Before I go into greater detail, I’d like to explain a bit about Visual Studio Code. Instead, it uses a separate editor component that is also used in Microsoft’s Azure DevOps product. It doesn’t use the Atom editor component though, like many other development tools built with Electron. (Though, I would guess that they use a lot of common code under the hood.)Visual Studio Code is an offering of its own, open source, not commercialized (for the time being at least), and based on Electron. All extensions can be installed without leaving Code.In fact, for my particular purpose, Qt/C++ development using Code is not supported out of the box. Many of these serve very small and well-defined purposes so you can quickly find out whether a specific extension is what you need. Whenever I was uncertain, I quickly tried several. There’s a rating system though. Many times, when you ask yourself, “ Can Code do X?”, the answer will be: “ Out-of-the-box, no, with an extension, yes, just fine.”The sheer amount of available extensions (all of them free as in beer, though some of their developers ask for a small and usually well-deserved contribution) can sometimes be confusing, especially when there are several that seem to serve the same purpose. Visual Studio Code ExtensionsOne of the things you’ll quickly discover with Code is the staggering amount of extensions available. You open one (or more) projects, and it’ll load information about all files in the project, as defined in the build file (QMake. I often find myself switching from Creator to Code just to do a search (and sometimes a replace), and then switching back.A bit of a difference in how the two work is that Qt Creator, like most IDEs, is project-based. Code lets you search for symbols in a very fine-tuned way, and also lets you replace with a lot of control (by folder, by file, by individual change, with full syntax-colored diff for every potential change etc). As an example, Code’s global search-and-replace functionality is vastly superior to Qt Creator’s.Here at KDAB, we often work with very large customer code bases, often old, often without access to the original developers, so finding our way around these is key to our work. In particular, it is not very integrated with the actual act of writing code.With Code, I can get small annotations about who changed a line of code and when, in a subdued color. Qt Creator does have comprehensive git support, but I don’t find it very accessible. VSC IntegrationAnother advantage of Code is its very extensive support for version control systems (which these days, let’s face it, essentially means git). Setting up Intellisense can be a bit of a hassle sometimes, especially when using CLang, but there is good documentation to help with that. Microsoft has “donated” the reputable Intellisense code completion from the big Visual Studio product to Code, but Qt Creator’s code completion is also rather nice and convenient, and they both work similarly enough to each other that it’s not too confusing to switch between the two frequently. In fact, I would say it’s a tie here. Opera for mac 1085It won’t replace Qt Creator in the foreseeable future (maybe never), but it certainly is yet another tool in the shed that helps you write more and better code in less time.If you’re interested in more, you may want to read our two part article on getting Visual Studio Code configured for Qt development. SummaryIn summary, we would advise Qt developers who care about their productivity to give Visual Studio Code a try. It remains to be seen how much CMake support there’ll be in Qt Creator once Qt 6 is released. With the recent decision to make CMake the default build tool for Qt-based projects, this will likely change, but at this time, CMake is not really a first-class citizen in Qt Creator, which was built very much around QMake.You certainly can use Qt Creator’s nice scaffolding for new projects and tell it to use CMake, but if you add new files or classes, you’ll need to add them manually to your CMakeLists.txt Code by way of the CMake extension, which gives you a lot more support here, at least for the time being. CMakeFinally, a few words about CMake. Even other developer tools are nicely integrated for example, if your organization is using Atlassian’s Jira issue tracking system, as we do here at KDAB, there is a convenient and comprehensive extension for that. We apologize for the mistake. We have removed such incorrect information to avoid spreading it further.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorMelissa ArchivesCategories |